Evidentialism in action

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sometimes it is practically beneficial to believe what is epistemically unwarranted. Philosophers have taken these cases to raise the question are there practical reasons for belief? Evidentialists argue that there cannot be any such reasons. Putative practical reasons for belief are not reasons for belief, but (to use a distinction from Pamela Hieronymi) reasons to manage our beliefs in a particular way. Pragmatists are not convinced. They accept that some (or perhaps all) reasons for belief are practical. The debate, it is widely thought, is at an impasse. But this debate fails to address what is puzzling and interesting about the cases. By focusing on reasons for belief, the debate completely overlooks the role of action in relation to belief. We should be talking about the reasons for actions that shape our beliefs, which I will call belief management. I argue for three related theses: (1) the interesting cases that motivate the debate are about belief management; (2) Evidentialism is irrelevant to belief management; (3) agents have practical reasons to manage their beliefs with the aim of forming true beliefs. These reasons are categorical in nature and result in the tension of conflict cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3409-3426
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume177
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2020

Keywords

  • Ethics of belief
  • Evidentialism
  • Philosophy of action
  • Practical reasons for belief
  • Pragmatism

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evidentialism in action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this