TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of building collapse risk and drift demands by nonlinear structural analyses using conventional hazard analysis versus direct simulation with cybershake seismograms
AU - Bijelić, Nenad
AU - Lin, Ting
AU - Deierlein, Gregory G.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Fulbright S&T Program, the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, the Shah Family Fellowship, and the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC; Contribution Number 8039; SCEC Award Numbers 13161, 14228, 15113, and 16139). SCEC is funded by National Science Foundation (NSF) Cooperative Agreement EAR-1033462 and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cooperative Agreement G12AC20038. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful reviews of the article. The authors gratefully acknowledge researchers associated with the SCEC for developing and advancing groundmotion simulations. In particular, the authors thank Robert Graves, Phil Maechling, and Scott Callaghan for fruitful discussions and help in accessing CyberShake simulations. The authors thank the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center (PEER) for providing the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) database. Analyses presented herein were performed using the Sherlock computing cluster at Stanford University.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Fulbright S&T Program, the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, the Shah Family Fellowship, and the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC; Contribution Number 8039; SCEC Award Numbers 13161, 14228, 15113, and 16139). SCEC is funded by National Science Foundation (NSF) Cooperative Agreement EAR-1033462 and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cooperative Agreement G12AC20038. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful reviews of the article. The authors gratefully acknowledge researchers associated with the SCEC for developing and advancing ground-motion simulations. In particular, the authors thank Robert Graves, Phil Maechling, and Scott Callaghan for fruitful discussions and help in accessing CyberShake simulations. The authors thank the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center (PEER) for providing the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) database. Analyses presented herein were performed using the Sherlock computing cluster at Stanford University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Seismological Society of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Limited data on strong earthquakes and their effect on structures pose challenges of making reliable risk assessments of tall buildings. For instance, although the collapse safety of tall buildings is likely controlled by large-magnitude earthquakes with long durations and high low-frequency content, there are few available recorded ground motions to evaluate these issues. The influence of geologic basins on amplifying ground-motion effects raises additional questions. Absent recorded motions from past large magnitude earthquakes, physics-based ground-motion simulations provide a viable alternative. This article examines collapse risk and drift demands of a 20-story archetype tall building using ground motions at four sites in the Los Angeles (LA) basin. Seismic demands of the building are calculated form nonlinear structural analyses using large datasets (∼500;000 ground motions per site) of unscaled, site-specific simulated seismograms. Seismic hazard and building performance from direct analysis of Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake motions are contrasted with values obtained based on conventional approaches that rely on recorded motions coupled with probabilistic seismic hazard assessments. At the LA downtown site, the two approaches yield similar estimates of mean annual frequency of collapse (λc), whereas nonlinear drift demands estimated with direct analysis are slightly larger primarily because of differences in hazard curves. Conversely, at the deep basin site, the CyberShake-based analysis yields around seven times larger λc than the conventional approach, and both hazard and spectral shapes of the motions drive the differences. Deaggregation of collapse risk is used to identify the relative contributions of causal earthquakes, linking building responses with specific seismograms and contrasting collapse risk with hazard. A strong discriminative power of average spectral acceleration and significant duration for predicting collapse is observed.
AB - Limited data on strong earthquakes and their effect on structures pose challenges of making reliable risk assessments of tall buildings. For instance, although the collapse safety of tall buildings is likely controlled by large-magnitude earthquakes with long durations and high low-frequency content, there are few available recorded ground motions to evaluate these issues. The influence of geologic basins on amplifying ground-motion effects raises additional questions. Absent recorded motions from past large magnitude earthquakes, physics-based ground-motion simulations provide a viable alternative. This article examines collapse risk and drift demands of a 20-story archetype tall building using ground motions at four sites in the Los Angeles (LA) basin. Seismic demands of the building are calculated form nonlinear structural analyses using large datasets (∼500;000 ground motions per site) of unscaled, site-specific simulated seismograms. Seismic hazard and building performance from direct analysis of Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake motions are contrasted with values obtained based on conventional approaches that rely on recorded motions coupled with probabilistic seismic hazard assessments. At the LA downtown site, the two approaches yield similar estimates of mean annual frequency of collapse (λc), whereas nonlinear drift demands estimated with direct analysis are slightly larger primarily because of differences in hazard curves. Conversely, at the deep basin site, the CyberShake-based analysis yields around seven times larger λc than the conventional approach, and both hazard and spectral shapes of the motions drive the differences. Deaggregation of collapse risk is used to identify the relative contributions of causal earthquakes, linking building responses with specific seismograms and contrasting collapse risk with hazard. A strong discriminative power of average spectral acceleration and significant duration for predicting collapse is observed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073424456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1785/0120180324
DO - 10.1785/0120180324
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073424456
SN - 0037-1106
VL - 109
SP - 1812
EP - 1828
JO - Bulletin - Seismological Society of America
JF - Bulletin - Seismological Society of America
IS - 5
ER -