Erratum: The Swift Bulge Survey: Optical and near-IR follow-up featuring a likely symbiotic X-ray binary & a focused wind CV (MNRAS (4344-4360) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa105)

A. W. Shaw, C. O. Heinke, T. J. Maccarone, G. R. Sivakoff, J. Strader, A. Bahramian, N. Degenaar, J. A. Kennea, E. Kuulkers, A. Rau, L. E. Rivera Sandoval, L. Shishkovsky, S. J. Swihart, A. J. Tetarenko, R. Wijnands, J. J.M. In't Zand

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The paper 'The Swift Bulge Survey: Optical and near-IR followup featuring a likely symbiotic X-ray binary & a focused wind CV' was published as Shaw et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 4344. Throughout the paper we occasionally referred to the sources 2MASS J17443041 - 2746004, 3XMMJ174214.9 - 291459 and VVVJ175233.93-290947.66 incorrectly by omitting the first digit (2) of the declination part of their names. We clarify their correct names in this erratum.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5081
Number of pages1
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume494
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020

Keywords

  • X-rays: Binaries
  • addenda
  • binaries: Symbiotic
  • cataclysmic variables
  • errata
  • infrared: Stars
  • novae
  • stars: Neutron
  • surveys

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: The Swift Bulge Survey: Optical and near-IR follow-up featuring a likely symbiotic X-ray binary & a focused wind CV (MNRAS (4344-4360) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa105)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this