Epistemic Schmagency?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Constructivist approaches in epistemology and ethics offer a promising account of normativity. But constructivism faces a powerful Schmagency Objection, raised by David Enoch. While Enoch’s objection has been widely discussed in the context of practical norms, no one has yet explored how the Schmagency Objection might undermine epistemic constructivism. In this paper, I rectify that gap. First, I develop the objection against a prominent form of epistemic constructivism, Belief Constitutivism. Belief Constitutivism is susceptible to a Schmagency Objection, I argue, because it locates the source of normativity in the belief rather than the agent. In the final section, I propose a version of epistemic constructivism that locates epistemic normativity as constitutive of agency. I argue that this version has the resources to respond to the Schmagency Objection.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEpistemic Schmagency?
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages289-310
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic Schmagency?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Flowerree, A. (2018). Epistemic Schmagency? In Epistemic Schmagency? (pp. 289-310). Palgrave Macmillan.