TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Concentrate- Versus Forage-Based Finishing Diet on Carcass Traits, Beef Palatability, and Color Stability in Longissimus Muscle from Angus Heifers
AU - Garmyn, A. J.
AU - Hilton, G. G.
AU - Mateescu, R. G.
AU - VanOverbeke, D. L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2010 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists.
PY - 2010/12/1
Y1 - 2010/12/1
N2 - The objective was to determine the effects of finishing diet on carcass traits, beef palatability, and color stability of LM from Angus heifers. Half-siblings were obtained from a herd selected for increased intramuscular fat, ribeye area, and percentage of retail product, and decreased backfat and were randomly assigned to a forage- or concentratebased finishing diet. Longissimus muscle samples (n = 155) were obtained and fabricated into steaks for trained sensory panel, Warner-Bratzler shear force, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS), and simulated retail display evaluation. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures of SAS using slaughter age as a covariate. Carcasses from concentrate-finished heifers had greater adjusted fat thickness (1.86 vs. 0.87 cm), greater percentage of KPH (2.14 vs. 1.35%), greater numerical YG (3.38 vs. 2.25), and greater marbling scores (modest 90 vs. traces 70) than forage-finished heifers (P < 0.05). Steaks from concentrate- fed heifers had lesser Warner- Bratzler shear force values (3.67 vs. 5.05 kg), greater tenderness ratings, greater beef flavor intensity, lesser grassy/cowy flavor intensity, and greater painty/fishy flavor intensity than steaks from foragefed heifers (P < 0.05). Initial TBARS were greater (P < 0.05) in steaks from concentrate-fed heifers when compared with grass-fed heifers, but TBARS were not different (P > 0.05) between diets after 7 d in retail display. Of the color measurements, only L* values differed between diets; they were greater (38.36 vs. 32.25; P < 0.05) for steaks from concentrate-fed heifers. This study points to several differences in beef palatability resulting from finishing diet composition.
AB - The objective was to determine the effects of finishing diet on carcass traits, beef palatability, and color stability of LM from Angus heifers. Half-siblings were obtained from a herd selected for increased intramuscular fat, ribeye area, and percentage of retail product, and decreased backfat and were randomly assigned to a forage- or concentratebased finishing diet. Longissimus muscle samples (n = 155) were obtained and fabricated into steaks for trained sensory panel, Warner-Bratzler shear force, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS), and simulated retail display evaluation. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures of SAS using slaughter age as a covariate. Carcasses from concentrate-finished heifers had greater adjusted fat thickness (1.86 vs. 0.87 cm), greater percentage of KPH (2.14 vs. 1.35%), greater numerical YG (3.38 vs. 2.25), and greater marbling scores (modest 90 vs. traces 70) than forage-finished heifers (P < 0.05). Steaks from concentrate- fed heifers had lesser Warner- Bratzler shear force values (3.67 vs. 5.05 kg), greater tenderness ratings, greater beef flavor intensity, lesser grassy/cowy flavor intensity, and greater painty/fishy flavor intensity than steaks from foragefed heifers (P < 0.05). Initial TBARS were greater (P < 0.05) in steaks from concentrate-fed heifers when compared with grass-fed heifers, but TBARS were not different (P > 0.05) between diets after 7 d in retail display. Of the color measurements, only L* values differed between diets; they were greater (38.36 vs. 32.25; P < 0.05) for steaks from concentrate-fed heifers. This study points to several differences in beef palatability resulting from finishing diet composition.
KW - Beef
KW - Color stability
KW - Concentrate finishing
KW - Forage finishing
KW - Palatability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866160641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30654-9
DO - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30654-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84866160641
SN - 1080-7446
VL - 26
SP - 579
EP - 586
JO - Professional Animal Scientist
JF - Professional Animal Scientist
IS - 6
ER -