TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of a direct-fed microbial on finishing beef cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and in vitro fermentation
AU - Ponce, C. H.
AU - DiLorenzo, N.
AU - Quinn, M. J.
AU - Smith, D. R.
AU - May, M. L.
AU - Galyean, M. L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This experiment was supported by C&E Agri Products, Baldwin, North Dakota, the Jessie W. Thornton Chair in Animal Science Endowment, and Paul Whitfield Horn Professorship funds at Texas Tech University, Lubbock. We thank Allflex USA (DFW Airport, TX), DSM Nutritional Products (Parsippany, NJ), Elanco Animal Health (Indianapolis, IN), Fort Dodge Animal Health (Overland Park, KS), Intervet/Schering-Plough Animal Health (De Soto, KS), and Kemin Industries (Des Moines, IA) for supplying various products used during the experiment. The authors also thank K. Robinson and R. Rocha (both of Texas Tech University Burnett Center for Beef Cattle Research and Instruc- tion, New Deal) for technical support in animal care and feeding.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2011 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists.
PY - 2011/6/1
Y1 - 2011/6/1
N2 - Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of BeefPro (C and E Agri Products, Baldwin, ND), a microencapsulated direct-fed microbial containing lactate-producing bacteria and digestive enzymes, on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle and on in vitro fermentation of highconcentrate substrates. In the performance study, 96 steers (average BW = 321 kg) were allotted randomly to 2 treatments: (1) control or (2) 200 mg/d per steer of BeefPro. Final BW did not differ between treatments (P = 0.19); however, steers fed BeefPro tended (P = 0.10) to have a greater carcass-adjusted final BW. Steers fed BeefPro tended (P < 0.07) to have a greater live-weightbasis ADG for the overall feeding period, and carcass-adjusted ADG was greater (P = 0.037) for cattle fed BeefPro. Dry matter intake was greater by steers fed BeefPro (P = 0.04), but G:F (P > 0.55) did not differ between treatments on a live-weight or carcass-adjusted basis. In the in vitro study, the same treatments as in the performance study were used in high-concentrate substrates to determine IVDMD and gas production kinetics. Neither gas production kinetics nor IVDMD was altered by BeefPro at 21.2 mg/kg of DM compared with control (P = 0.10). Although in vitro data did not provide evidence of alterations in ruminal fermentation by including BeefPro in substrates, feedlot performance data suggest that BeefPro, when fed daily at a dose of 200 mg per steer, can have positive effects on DMI and ADG of finishing beef cattle.
AB - Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of BeefPro (C and E Agri Products, Baldwin, ND), a microencapsulated direct-fed microbial containing lactate-producing bacteria and digestive enzymes, on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle and on in vitro fermentation of highconcentrate substrates. In the performance study, 96 steers (average BW = 321 kg) were allotted randomly to 2 treatments: (1) control or (2) 200 mg/d per steer of BeefPro. Final BW did not differ between treatments (P = 0.19); however, steers fed BeefPro tended (P = 0.10) to have a greater carcass-adjusted final BW. Steers fed BeefPro tended (P < 0.07) to have a greater live-weightbasis ADG for the overall feeding period, and carcass-adjusted ADG was greater (P = 0.037) for cattle fed BeefPro. Dry matter intake was greater by steers fed BeefPro (P = 0.04), but G:F (P > 0.55) did not differ between treatments on a live-weight or carcass-adjusted basis. In the in vitro study, the same treatments as in the performance study were used in high-concentrate substrates to determine IVDMD and gas production kinetics. Neither gas production kinetics nor IVDMD was altered by BeefPro at 21.2 mg/kg of DM compared with control (P = 0.10). Although in vitro data did not provide evidence of alterations in ruminal fermentation by including BeefPro in substrates, feedlot performance data suggest that BeefPro, when fed daily at a dose of 200 mg per steer, can have positive effects on DMI and ADG of finishing beef cattle.
KW - Beef cattle
KW - Digestive enzyme
KW - Direct-fed microbial
KW - Feedlot performance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957715809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30485-X
DO - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30485-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84957715809
SN - 1080-7446
VL - 27
SP - 276
EP - 281
JO - Professional Animal Scientist
JF - Professional Animal Scientist
IS - 3
ER -