Effect of the alumina shell on the melting temperature depression for aluminum nanoparticles

Valery I. Levitas, Michelle L. Pantoya, Garima Chauhan, Iris Rivero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

The dependence of aluminum (Al) melting temperature on particle size was studied using a differential scanning calorimeter and thermogravitmetric analyzer for particles encapsulated in an oxide shell. Pressure generation within the Al core leads to an increase in melting temperature in comparison with traditional melting temperature depression calculated using the Gibbs-Thomson equation. On the basis of elasticity theory, the pressure in the Al core at the onset of melting is caused mainly by surface tension at the alumina-air and Al-alumina interfaces. This implies that pressure due to the difference in thermal expansion of aluminum and alumina relaxes. A possible relaxation mechanism is discussed. The static strength of the alumina shell and the maximum static generated pressure in aluminum were evaluated. Mechanically damaging the oxide shell was shown to reduce the melting temperature due to a decrease in generated pressure within the Al core. Thus, reduction in melting temperature can be used as a quantitative measure of damage to the oxide shell. Results from X-ray diffraction studies show that 17-nm diameter Al particles had a 2-nm thick alumina shell in the γ-phase, while for a flat surface Al had an amorphous alumina shell stable to a thickness of 4 nm. Thus, pressure due to surface tension promotes denser γ-phases. Since particles with shells initially in the amorphous or γ-phase show the same flame speed and ignition delay time, fast oxidation observed under high heating rates cannot be explained by a phase transformation in the alumina shell. These findings have important implications for the melt-dispersion mechanism for fast Al oxidation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14088-14096
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry C
Volume113
Issue number32
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2009

    Fingerprint

Cite this