Abstract
We explore the influence of experimental monitor cheap talk on offers in single-shot ultimatum bargaining games. We find that behavior more closely resembles Nash equilibrium predictions when subjects are provided information about the theoretical money maximizing solution in addition to information about why behavior may deviate from this equilibrium. Among other things, results suggest subjects fail to behave consistently with the Nash equilibrium prediction because of a lack of knowledge of the theoretical money maximizing solution or because of a lack of common expectations about the rationality and beliefs of other players.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 439-443 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2004 |
Keywords
- Bounded rationality
- Cheap talk
- Experimental methods
- Ultimatum games