TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of age entering feedlot and implant regimen on beef cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation1
AU - Barham, B.
AU - Beck, P.
AU - Apple, J.
AU - Whitworth, W.
AU - Miller, M.
AU - Gadberry, S.
N1 - Funding Information:
1 Partial funding of this project was from the Arkansas Beef Council through the $1.00/head Beef Checkoff, as well as the University of Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station (Hatch project no. AR002265). The authors express their appreciation to Brandon Stuart, Hannah Gray, Pat Capps, and Josh Loe of the University of Arkansas Southwestern Research and Extension Center (Hope, AR) and Lonnie Hughes and Brad Johnson of Texas Tech University for technical assistance in completing this project. 2 In memory of our colleague and friend who was tragically taken from us (August 1, 1974, to July 9, 2011). 3 Corresponding author: pbeck@uaex.edu
Publisher Copyright:
© 2012 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists.
PY - 2012/2/1
Y1 - 2012/2/1
N2 - The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of age of calves entering the feedlot and implant regimen over the lifetime of a calf on performance and carcass characteristics in a systems analysis approach. Beef calves (n = 80 and 64 for Exp. 1 and 2, respectively), with initial BW of 220 ± 5.7 and 222 ± 3.9 kg (Exp. 1 and 2, respectively), were delivered to the Southwest Research and Extension Center (Hope, AR) drylot facility upon removal from dam (October 2, 2007, and May 1, 2008, for Exp. 1 and 2, respectively). After the 63-d preconditioning phase, 50% of the cattle were shipped to Texas Tech University Beef Cattle Center to be finished as calves (CLF) and the remainder were finishing as yearlings (YRLNG). Growth-promoting implants were either administered at the beginning of preconditioning, at the start of grazing, at the initiation of feeding, and at standard reimplant time during finishing (AGG) or delayed until standard reimplant time during finishing (DLY). Finishing performance was greater (P ≤ 0.02) in AGG compared with DLY and in YRLNG compared with CLF. Marbling scores were greater (P < 0.01) for CLF (531 ± 16.9) than for YRLNG (434 ± 15.9), and DLY had greater (P = 0.03) marbling scores than did AGG (507 vs. 456 ± 16.6, respectively) in Exp. 1. Age entering the feedlot did not affect shear force values in either experiment (P ≥ 0.43). Shear values were less (P < 0.01) for DLY (2.86 ± 0.10 kg) compared with AGG (3.03 ± 0.10 kg) in Exp. 1; however, neither age entering the finishing phase nor implant treatment affected (P ≥ 0.12) marbling score or WBSF in Exp. 2. Although implants increased gain performance, timing of implant and nutritional status after implant had an effect on carcass quality of YRLNG but not CLF.
AB - The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of age of calves entering the feedlot and implant regimen over the lifetime of a calf on performance and carcass characteristics in a systems analysis approach. Beef calves (n = 80 and 64 for Exp. 1 and 2, respectively), with initial BW of 220 ± 5.7 and 222 ± 3.9 kg (Exp. 1 and 2, respectively), were delivered to the Southwest Research and Extension Center (Hope, AR) drylot facility upon removal from dam (October 2, 2007, and May 1, 2008, for Exp. 1 and 2, respectively). After the 63-d preconditioning phase, 50% of the cattle were shipped to Texas Tech University Beef Cattle Center to be finished as calves (CLF) and the remainder were finishing as yearlings (YRLNG). Growth-promoting implants were either administered at the beginning of preconditioning, at the start of grazing, at the initiation of feeding, and at standard reimplant time during finishing (AGG) or delayed until standard reimplant time during finishing (DLY). Finishing performance was greater (P ≤ 0.02) in AGG compared with DLY and in YRLNG compared with CLF. Marbling scores were greater (P < 0.01) for CLF (531 ± 16.9) than for YRLNG (434 ± 15.9), and DLY had greater (P = 0.03) marbling scores than did AGG (507 vs. 456 ± 16.6, respectively) in Exp. 1. Age entering the feedlot did not affect shear force values in either experiment (P ≥ 0.43). Shear values were less (P < 0.01) for DLY (2.86 ± 0.10 kg) compared with AGG (3.03 ± 0.10 kg) in Exp. 1; however, neither age entering the finishing phase nor implant treatment affected (P ≥ 0.12) marbling score or WBSF in Exp. 2. Although implants increased gain performance, timing of implant and nutritional status after implant had an effect on carcass quality of YRLNG but not CLF.
KW - Beef cattle
KW - Finishing system
KW - Implantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983155070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30312-0
DO - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30312-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84983155070
SN - 1080-7446
VL - 28
SP - 20
EP - 31
JO - Professional Animal Scientist
JF - Professional Animal Scientist
IS - 1
ER -