Do Hypothetical Imperatives Require Categorical Imperatives?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recently, the idea that every hypothetical imperative must somehow be ‘backed up’ by a prior categorical imperative has gained a certain influence among Kant interpreters and ethicists influenced by Kant. Since instrumentalism is the position that holds that hypothetical imperatives can by themselves and without the aid of categorical imperatives explain all valid forms of practical reasoning, the influential idea amounts to a rejection of instrumentalism as internally incoherent. This paper argues against this prevailing view both as an interpretation of Kant and as philosophical understanding of practical reason. In particular, it will be argued that many of the arguments that claim to show that hypothetical imperatives must be backed up by categorical imperatives mistakenly assume that the form of practical reasoning must itself occur as a premise within the reasoning. An alternative to this assumption will be offered. I will conclude that while instrumentalism may well be false, t
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-107
JournalEuropean Journal of Philosophy
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do Hypothetical Imperatives Require Categorical Imperatives?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this