Direct comparison of derivatization strategies for LC-MS/MS analysis of: N -glycans

Shiyue Zhou, Lucas Veillon, Xue Dong, Yifan Huang, Yehia Mechref

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

81 Scopus citations

Abstract

Protein glycosylation is a common post-translational modification that has significant impacts on protein folding, lifespan, conformation, distribution and function. N-Glycans, which are attached to asparagine residues of proteins, are studied most often due to their compatibility with enzymatic release. Despite the ease of N-glycan release, compositional and structural complexity coupled with poor ionization efficiency during liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) make quantitative glycomic studies a significant challenge. To overcome these challenges, glycans are almost always derivatized prior to LC-MS analyses to impart favorable characteristics, such as improved ionization efficiency, increased LC separation efficiency and the production of more informative fragments during tandem MS. There are a number of derivatization methods available for LC-MS analysis of glycans, each of which imparts different properties that affect both glycan retention on LC columns and MS analyses. To provide guidance for the proper selection of derivatizing reagents and LC columns, herein, we describe a comprehensive assessment of 2-aminobenzamide, procainamide, aminoxyTMT, RapiFluor-MS (RFMS) labeling, reduction and reduction with permethylation for N-glycan analysis. Of the derivatization strategies examined, RFMS provided the highest MS signal enhancement for neutral glycans, while permethylation significantly enhanced the MS intensity and structural stability of sialylated glycans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4446-4455
Number of pages10
JournalAnalyst
Volume142
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 7 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct comparison of derivatization strategies for LC-MS/MS analysis of: N -glycans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this