TY - JOUR
T1 - Criminal Thinking
T2 - A Fixed or Fluid Process?
AU - Morgan, Robert D.
AU - Batastini, Ashley B.
AU - Murray, Danielle D.
AU - Serna, Catherine
AU - Porras, Claudia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, © 2015 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology.
PY - 2015/10/3
Y1 - 2015/10/3
N2 - This research examined whether levels of criminal thinking are fixed or fluid across situational contexts. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that criminal thinking and antisocial attitudes would increase with greater proximity to a criminal act. Results of Study 1 revealed no significant group differences on measures of criminal thinking and attitudes between college students who were asked to plan what they believed to be a criminal act and those who viewed a movie clip depicting a criminal act. Inmates in Study 2 completed the same outcome measures as participants in Study 1; however, prior to post-assessment, those in the experimental group were instructed to recall a prior crime, whereas the control group completed post-assessments under normal testing conditions. Results of Study 2 were generally consistent with Study 1. Additional research is needed to understand the nature of criminal cognitions over time and their susceptibility to various environmental factors.
AB - This research examined whether levels of criminal thinking are fixed or fluid across situational contexts. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that criminal thinking and antisocial attitudes would increase with greater proximity to a criminal act. Results of Study 1 revealed no significant group differences on measures of criminal thinking and attitudes between college students who were asked to plan what they believed to be a criminal act and those who viewed a movie clip depicting a criminal act. Inmates in Study 2 completed the same outcome measures as participants in Study 1; however, prior to post-assessment, those in the experimental group were instructed to recall a prior crime, whereas the control group completed post-assessments under normal testing conditions. Results of Study 2 were generally consistent with Study 1. Additional research is needed to understand the nature of criminal cognitions over time and their susceptibility to various environmental factors.
KW - antisocial attitudes
KW - correctional treatment
KW - criminal thinking
KW - risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940765615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0093854815578948
DO - 10.1177/0093854815578948
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84940765615
SN - 0093-8548
VL - 42
SP - 1045
EP - 1065
JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior
JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior
IS - 10
ER -