Coproduction or cooptation? Real-time spin and social media response during the 2012 French and US presidential debates

Chris Wells, Jack Van Thomme, Peter Maurer, Alex Hanna, Jon Pevehouse, Dhavan V. Shah, Erik Bucy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Major political events now unfold in a hybrid political information cycle: even as millions of citizens tune in to television broadcasts, many also comment - and receive others' comments - over social media. In previous research, we have described how biobehavioral cues spur Twitter discussion of candidates during American presidential debates. Here we extend that research to also account for other elements of the communication environment - in particular, messages from political and media elites reaching them via a 'second screen' such as mobile phone or tablet - and we apply our analyses to debates in both the United States and France. Specifically, we examine the relationship between the Twitter posts of 300 politicians, organizations and media figures from each country and the relevant messages of the larger Twitterverse during the debates. Our findings reveal commonalities in social media response in the two countries, particularly the powerful role of party figures and pundits in spurring social media posting. We also note differences between the social media cultures of the two countries, including the finding that French elites commanded relatively more attention (in the form of retweets) than their American counterparts. Implications for debate evaluations and online expression are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-233
Number of pages28
JournalFrench Politics
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Keywords

  • Twitter
  • debate
  • second screen
  • social media

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Coproduction or cooptation? Real-time spin and social media response during the 2012 French and US presidential debates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this