Construct validation of the supports intensity scale - Children and adult versions: An application of a pseudo multitrait-multimethod approach

Hyojeong Seo, Karrie A. Shogren, Todd D. Little, James R. Thompson, Michael L. Wehmeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined the convergent validity of the Supports Intensity Scale - Adult Version (SIS-A; Thompson et al., 2015a) and Supports Intensity Scale - Children's Version (SIS-C; Thompson et al., 2016a). Data from SISOnline (n = 129,864) for the SIS-A and from the SIS-C standardization sample (n = 4,015) were used for analyses. Using a pseudo multitrait-multimethod model, we estimated observed support needs scores as shared trait (support needs concept) and method (type, frequency, and daily support time) variances. Overall, trait variances more strongly influenced support needs scores than method variances, supporting the convergent validity of both versions of SIS. Findings also suggested that each of three methods of measuring support needs uniquely contributed to observed support needs ratings although different patterns existed between the SIS-A and SIS-C.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)550-563
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Volume121
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2016

Keywords

  • Convergent validity
  • Multitrait-multimethod model
  • Supports Intensity Scale - Adult Version
  • Supports Intensity Scale - Children's Version

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Construct validation of the supports intensity scale - Children and adult versions: An application of a pseudo multitrait-multimethod approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this