Abstract
This research uses the results of a series of within-sample experiments to elicit risk premium measures from agricultural producers. Results show that there is little consistency between measures in different contexts and using different elicitation methods, suggesting that underlying risk preferences are not consistent. These results highlight some of the difficulty with expected utility theory and risk measurement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-49 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Agricultural Economics |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2005 |
Keywords
- Economic experiments
- Expected utility
- Risk
- Risk elicitation
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consistency of risk premium measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Hudson, D., Coble, K., & Lusk, J. (2005). Consistency of risk premium measures. Agricultural Economics, 33(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00366.x