TY - JOUR
T1 - Conservation in a cup of water
T2 - Estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA
AU - Lodge, David M.
AU - Turner, Cameron R.
AU - Jerde, Christopher L.
AU - Barnes, Matthew A.
AU - Chadderton, Lindsay
AU - Egan, Scott P.
AU - Feder, Jeffrey L.
AU - Mahon, Andrew R.
AU - Pfrender, Michael E.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Three mantras often guide species and ecosystem management: (i) for preventing invasions by harmful species, 'early detection and rapid response'; (ii) for conserving imperilled native species, 'protection of biodiversity hotspots'; and (iii) for assessing biosecurity risk, 'an ounce of prevention equals a pound of cure.' However, these and other management goals are elusive when traditional sampling tools (e.g. netting, traps, electrofishing, visual surveys) have poor detection limits, are too slow or are not feasible. One visionary solution is to use an organism's DNA in the environment (eDNA), rather than the organism itself, as the target of detection. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide new evidence demonstrating the feasibility of this approach, showing that eDNA is an accurate indicator of the presence of an impressively diverse set of six aquatic or amphibious taxa including invertebrates, amphibians, a fish and a mammal in a wide range of freshwater habitats. They are also the first to demonstrate that the abundance of eDNA, as measured by qPCR, correlates positively with population abundance estimated with traditional tools. Finally, Thomsen et al. (2012) demonstrate that next-generation sequencing of eDNA can quantify species richness. Overall, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide a revolutionary roadmap for using eDNA for detection of species, estimates of relative abundance and quantification of biodiversity.
AB - Three mantras often guide species and ecosystem management: (i) for preventing invasions by harmful species, 'early detection and rapid response'; (ii) for conserving imperilled native species, 'protection of biodiversity hotspots'; and (iii) for assessing biosecurity risk, 'an ounce of prevention equals a pound of cure.' However, these and other management goals are elusive when traditional sampling tools (e.g. netting, traps, electrofishing, visual surveys) have poor detection limits, are too slow or are not feasible. One visionary solution is to use an organism's DNA in the environment (eDNA), rather than the organism itself, as the target of detection. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide new evidence demonstrating the feasibility of this approach, showing that eDNA is an accurate indicator of the presence of an impressively diverse set of six aquatic or amphibious taxa including invertebrates, amphibians, a fish and a mammal in a wide range of freshwater habitats. They are also the first to demonstrate that the abundance of eDNA, as measured by qPCR, correlates positively with population abundance estimated with traditional tools. Finally, Thomsen et al. (2012) demonstrate that next-generation sequencing of eDNA can quantify species richness. Overall, Thomsen et al. (2012) provide a revolutionary roadmap for using eDNA for detection of species, estimates of relative abundance and quantification of biodiversity.
KW - biodiversity assessment
KW - biosecurity
KW - eDNA
KW - invasive species
KW - natural resource management
KW - pyrosequencing
KW - qPCR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861537650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 22624944
AN - SCOPUS:84861537650
SN - 0962-1083
VL - 21
SP - 2555
EP - 2558
JO - Molecular Ecology
JF - Molecular Ecology
IS - 11
ER -