@article{9a57821707e64b349cb802d278293b9a,
title = "Comment on {"}calculated vibrational states of ozone up to dissociation{"} [J. Chem. Phys. 144, 074302 (2016)]",
abstract = "Researchers shared their views on the findings of the {\textquoteleft}calculated vibrational states of ozone up to dissociation{\textquoteright} study. They found that for the atomic mass calculation, we found that our computed energy levels agree with those of the original authors of the study. The researchers observed that their vibrational levels computed using nuclear masses showed the opposite trend than that of the original study. It was also observed that specifically, for two isotopes of oxygen, 16O and 17O, the masses used in the original study corresponded to the bare nuclei, while for the 18O isotope, the atomic mass was used as reported.",
author = "J{\'a}nos Sarka and Bill Poirier",
note = "Funding Information: The authors would like to acknowledge the input provided by Richard Dawes as a personal communication regarding the exact source of the discrepancies between their computations and ours. Additionally, Poirier wishes to thank D. Babikov and I. Gayday for further clearing up the aforementioned state labeling issues. Poirier also acknowledges a research grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CHE-1665370).",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1063/5.0002762",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
journal = "The Journal of Chemical Physics",
issn = "0021-9606",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics",
number = "17",
}