TY - JOUR
T1 - Binding between ground-state aluminum ions and small molecules
T2 - A1+·(H2/CH4/C2H 2/C2H4/C2H6). n,. Can Al+ insert into H2?
AU - Kemper, Paul R.
AU - Bushenell, John
AU - Bowers, Michael T.
AU - Gellene, Gregory I.
PY - 1998/10/29
Y1 - 1998/10/29
N2 - Binding energies and entropies have been measured for the attachment of up to four H2 ligands and six small hydrocarbons to ground-state Al+ ions (1S, 3s2). Bond energies are typically very weak compared with analogous transition metal ion or the isovalent boron ion systems. Bond energies for the first ligand addition to Al+ are 1.4 (H2), 6.1 (CH4), 9.3 (C2H6), 14.0 (C2H2), and 15.1 kcal/mol for C2H4. The origin of the weak bonding lies primarily in the large, repulsive 3s orbital, which prevents close approach by the ligands. In addition, the lack of low-energy acceptor orbitals on the Al+ ion minimizes electron donation to the metal ion and also reduces the Al+/ligand attraction. Finally, the lack of low lying, occupied π-type orbitals prevents donation from the Al+ to the σ* orbitals on the ligands. A very detailed theoretical examination of the Al+(H2)n cluster energetics was also made. The purpose was to investigate the possibility of insertion by the Al+ into the H-H bond via σ bond activation, as is found with the isovalent B+ ion. The calculations showed that the inserted HAlH+ ion is stable but that its formation is endothermic by 10.9 kcal/mol with respect to the separated reactants. The inserted HAlH+(H2)2 ion, however, appears to be almost isoenergetic with the uninserted Al+(H2)3 isomeric cluster.
AB - Binding energies and entropies have been measured for the attachment of up to four H2 ligands and six small hydrocarbons to ground-state Al+ ions (1S, 3s2). Bond energies are typically very weak compared with analogous transition metal ion or the isovalent boron ion systems. Bond energies for the first ligand addition to Al+ are 1.4 (H2), 6.1 (CH4), 9.3 (C2H6), 14.0 (C2H2), and 15.1 kcal/mol for C2H4. The origin of the weak bonding lies primarily in the large, repulsive 3s orbital, which prevents close approach by the ligands. In addition, the lack of low-energy acceptor orbitals on the Al+ ion minimizes electron donation to the metal ion and also reduces the Al+/ligand attraction. Finally, the lack of low lying, occupied π-type orbitals prevents donation from the Al+ to the σ* orbitals on the ligands. A very detailed theoretical examination of the Al+(H2)n cluster energetics was also made. The purpose was to investigate the possibility of insertion by the Al+ into the H-H bond via σ bond activation, as is found with the isovalent B+ ion. The calculations showed that the inserted HAlH+ ion is stable but that its formation is endothermic by 10.9 kcal/mol with respect to the separated reactants. The inserted HAlH+(H2)2 ion, however, appears to be almost isoenergetic with the uninserted Al+(H2)3 isomeric cluster.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001010230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/jp982090o
DO - 10.1021/jp982090o
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0001010230
SN - 1089-5639
VL - 102
SP - 8590
EP - 8597
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry A
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry A
IS - 44
ER -