Barack obama vs bristol palin: Why the president's sex education policy wins

Dana A. Weiser, Monica K. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


The federal government has exponentially increased funding for abstinence-only sex education over the last few decades, a position supported by former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin's daughter Bristol. Unfortunately, empirical research indicates that abstinence-only education is ineffective and may have negative consequences for adolescents. Despite encouragement of abstinence, adolescents continue to engage in sexual relationships, indicating that a different approach to sex education should be supported. This situation raises a number of justice issues because it is important for the government to fund sex education curricula that instruct adolescents on how to protect themselves from pregnancy and STDs. The majority of parents also disagree with the federal funding of abstinence-only education and support more comprehensive education. This indicates that funding abstinence-only education is diametrically opposed to community sentiment. Federal funding of abstinence-only sex education is also problematic as such policies violate a number of adolescents' constitutional rights. Therefore, the federal government must revise its current sex education policies. President Obama's proposed plan has the potential to overcome many of these issues associated with abstinence-only education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-424
Number of pages14
JournalContemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2010


  • Community sentiment
  • STD prevention
  • Sex education policy
  • Sexual health
  • Sexual self-efficacy
  • Teen pregnancy


Dive into the research topics of 'Barack obama vs bristol palin: Why the president's sex education policy wins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this