Abstract
This article examines opinion dynamics on the complicated public
policy issue of Electoral College reform. The study shows how
partisan perceptions and political sophistication affect opinion on
Electoral College reform. Taking advantage of an experiment and
of an analysis of polls after the 2000 election, this study finds that
those with higher levels of political sophistication were more likely
to oppose reform. Proponents of reform often rely on simple
majoritarian arguments while those opposed to reform are forced to
justify the Electoral College based on more complicated arguments
involving federalism and support for the two-party system. Those with
higher levels of political sophistication were more likely to understand,
and hence accept, difficult arguments made by opponents of reform.
Partisanship also played an important influence in shaping attitudes
toward the Electoral College.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 265-288 |
Journal | Politics & Policy |
State | Published - Apr 2009 |