Analyzing Airborne Environmental DNA: A Comparison of Extraction Methods, Primer Type, and Trap Type on the Ability to Detect Airborne eDNA from Terrestrial Plant Communities

Mark Johnson; Robert Cox; Matthew Barnes

Analyzing Airborne Environmental DNA: A Comparison of Extraction Methods, Primer Type, and Trap Type on the Ability to Detect Airborne eDNA from Terrestrial Plant Communities

Mark Johnson, Robert Cox, Matthew Barnes

Natural Resources Management

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	176-185
Journal	Environmental DNA
State	Published - 2019

Cite this

@article{bb5a4ad35a444e468db0d33f2d8b8c55,

title = "Analyzing Airborne Environmental DNA: A Comparison of Extraction Methods, Primer Type, and Trap Type on the Ability to Detect Airborne eDNA from Terrestrial Plant Communities",

author = "Mark Johnson and Robert Cox and Matthew Barnes",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

pages = "176--185",

journal = "Environmental DNA",

}

Analyzing Airborne Environmental DNA: A Comparison of Extraction Methods, Primer Type, and Trap Type on the Ability to Detect Airborne eDNA from Terrestrial Plant Communities

Fingerprint

Cite this