AN INVESTIGATION OF AUDITOR JUDGMENTS OF THE EFFECT OF PRELIMINARY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ON THE EXTENT OF SUBSTANTIVE TESTING

William Pasewark, Jerry R. Strawser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A major type of substantive testing procedure performed during the audit examination are analytical procedures. The use of analytical procedures (APs) in the preliminary stages of the audit examination is required for both United States (U.S.) and international audits. Despite this requirement, neither international (International Auditing Guideline 12 and Australian Statement of Auditing Practice 17) nor U.S. (Statement on Auditing Standards No. 56) auditing standards provide guidance concerning the use of preliminary APs for specific account balances or in specific circumstances. This research represents a descriptive examination of auditor judgments concerning the use of preliminary APs in the audit engagement. Our results indicate that auditors believe that performing preliminary APs generally results in a significant reduction in the need for substantive tests of details; however, the reduction in substantive testing varied according to which APs were performed. The high levels o
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-108
JournalAccounting & Finance
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'AN INVESTIGATION OF AUDITOR JUDGMENTS OF THE EFFECT OF PRELIMINARY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ON THE EXTENT OF SUBSTANTIVE TESTING'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this