An empirical comparison of approaches for quantitatively assessing the content adequacy of paper-and-pencil measurement instruments.

C. A. Schriesheim, Claudia Cogliser, T. A. Scandura, M. J. Lankau, K. J. Powers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite content adequacy being essential for valid measurement, a well-delineated quantitative method for its examination only recently has become available. Using this new approach, an empirical comparison of three methods of collecting and two methods of analyzing content adequacy data is presented. It is shown that these different methods yield results that have not only substantial similarities but also some differences. Several recommendations for future use and future research are presented and discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-156
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
StatePublished - Apr 1 1999

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical comparison of approaches for quantitatively assessing the content adequacy of paper-and-pencil measurement instruments.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this