Despite content adequacy being essential for valid measurement, a well-delineated quantitative method for its examination only recently has become available. Using this new approach, an empirical comparison of three methods of collecting and two methods of analyzing content adequacy data is presented. It is shown that these different methods yield results that have not only substantial similarities but also some differences. Several recommendations for future use and future research are presented and discussed.
|Journal||Organizational Research Methods|
|State||Published - Apr 1 1999|