TY - JOUR
T1 - Adsorption isotope effects of water on mesoporous silica and alumina with implications for the land-vegetation-atmosphere system
AU - Lin, Ying
AU - Horita, Juske
AU - Abe, Osamu
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Changjie Liu for his help in TC/EA setup for isotope analysis of water, Bo Zhao for the SEM images, and Moira Ridley for the N 2 isotherms. The authors thank AE E. Schauble and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments. The project is funded by NSF/EAR 1316228 and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 41373009 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/2/15
Y1 - 2018/2/15
N2 - Soil water dynamics within a vadose (unsaturated) zone is a key component in the hydrologic cycle, especially in arid regions. In applying the Craig-Gordon evaporation model to obtain isotopic compositions of soil water and the evaporated vapor in land-surface models (LSMs), it has been assumed that the equilibrium isotope fractionation factors between soil water and water vapor, α(2H) and α(18O), are identical to those between liquid and vapor of bulk water. Isotope effects in water condensation arise from intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the condensed phase and the appearance of hindered rotation/translation. Hydrogen bonding between water molecules and pore surface hydroxyl groups influences adsorption isotope effects. To test whether equilibrium fractionation factors between soil water and water vapor are identical to those between liquid and vapor of bulk water and to evaluate the influence of pore size and chemical composition upon adsorption isotope effects, we extended our previous experiments of a mesoporous silica (15 nm) to two other mesoporous materials, a silica (6 nm) and an alumina (5.8 nm). Our results demonstrated that α(2H) and α(18O) between adsorbed water and water vapor are 1.057 and 1.0086 for silica (6 nm) and 1.041 and 1.0063 for alumina (5.8 nm), respectively, at saturation pressure (po), which are smaller than 1.075 and 1.0089, respectively, between liquid and vapor phases of free water at 30 °C and that the differences exaggerate at low water contents. However, the profiles of α values with relative pressures (p/po) for these three materials differ due to the differences in chemical compositions and pore sizes. Empirical formula relating α(2H) and α(18O) values to the proportions of filled pores (f) are developed for potential applications to natural soils. Our results from triple oxygen isotope analyses demonstrated that the isotope fractionation does not follow a canonical law. For the silica (15 nm), fractionation exponents (17θ) are 0.5361 ± 0.0018 and 0.5389 ± 0.0016 at p/po = 0.72 and 0.77, respectively. For the silica (6 nm), 17θ values are 0.5330 ± 0.0011 at p/po = 0.65 and 0.5278 ± 0.0010 at p/po = 0.81. For the alumina (5.8 nm), 17θ value is 0.5316 ± 0.0015 at p/po = 0.78. These values are greater than or equal to that of liquid-vapor equilibrium of bulk water (0.529 ± 0.001).
AB - Soil water dynamics within a vadose (unsaturated) zone is a key component in the hydrologic cycle, especially in arid regions. In applying the Craig-Gordon evaporation model to obtain isotopic compositions of soil water and the evaporated vapor in land-surface models (LSMs), it has been assumed that the equilibrium isotope fractionation factors between soil water and water vapor, α(2H) and α(18O), are identical to those between liquid and vapor of bulk water. Isotope effects in water condensation arise from intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the condensed phase and the appearance of hindered rotation/translation. Hydrogen bonding between water molecules and pore surface hydroxyl groups influences adsorption isotope effects. To test whether equilibrium fractionation factors between soil water and water vapor are identical to those between liquid and vapor of bulk water and to evaluate the influence of pore size and chemical composition upon adsorption isotope effects, we extended our previous experiments of a mesoporous silica (15 nm) to two other mesoporous materials, a silica (6 nm) and an alumina (5.8 nm). Our results demonstrated that α(2H) and α(18O) between adsorbed water and water vapor are 1.057 and 1.0086 for silica (6 nm) and 1.041 and 1.0063 for alumina (5.8 nm), respectively, at saturation pressure (po), which are smaller than 1.075 and 1.0089, respectively, between liquid and vapor phases of free water at 30 °C and that the differences exaggerate at low water contents. However, the profiles of α values with relative pressures (p/po) for these three materials differ due to the differences in chemical compositions and pore sizes. Empirical formula relating α(2H) and α(18O) values to the proportions of filled pores (f) are developed for potential applications to natural soils. Our results from triple oxygen isotope analyses demonstrated that the isotope fractionation does not follow a canonical law. For the silica (15 nm), fractionation exponents (17θ) are 0.5361 ± 0.0018 and 0.5389 ± 0.0016 at p/po = 0.72 and 0.77, respectively. For the silica (6 nm), 17θ values are 0.5330 ± 0.0011 at p/po = 0.65 and 0.5278 ± 0.0010 at p/po = 0.81. For the alumina (5.8 nm), 17θ value is 0.5316 ± 0.0015 at p/po = 0.78. These values are greater than or equal to that of liquid-vapor equilibrium of bulk water (0.529 ± 0.001).
KW - Adsorption isotope effects
KW - Craig-Gordon evaporation model
KW - Isotope fractionation exponent
KW - Isotope fractionation factor
KW - Liquid-vapor equilibrium
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044358481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gca.2017.12.021
DO - 10.1016/j.gca.2017.12.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044358481
SN - 0016-7037
VL - 223
SP - 520
EP - 536
JO - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
JF - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
ER -