A sediment ecotoxicity assessment platform for in situ measures of chemistry, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Part 2: Integrated application to a shallow estuary

Gunther Rosen, D. Bart Chadwick, G. Allen Burton, W. Keith Taulbee, Marc S. Greenberg, Guilherme R. Lotufo, Danny D. Reible

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comprehensive, weight-of-evidence based ecological risk assessment approach integrating laboratory and in situ bioaccumulation and toxicity testing, passive sampler devices, hydrological characterization tools, continuous water quality sensing, and multi-phase chemical analyses was evaluated. The test site used to demonstrate the approach was a shallow estuarine wetland where groundwater seepage and elevated organic and inorganic contaminants were of potential concern. Although groundwater was discharging into the surficial sediments, little to no chemical contamination was associated with the infiltrating groundwater. Results from bulk chemistry analysis, toxicity testing, and bioaccumulation, however, suggested possible PAH toxicity at one station, which might have been enhanced by UV photoactivation, explaining the differences between in situ and laboratory amphipod survival. Concurrently deployed PAH bioaccumulation on solid-phase micro-extraction fibers positively correlated (r 2 ≥ 0.977) with in situ PAH bioaccumulation in amphipods, attesting to their utility as biomimetics, and contributing to the overall improved linkage between exposure and effects demonstrated by this approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-465
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume162
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Keywords

  • In situ
  • Passive samplers
  • Sediment
  • Toxicity
  • Weight-of-evidence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A sediment ecotoxicity assessment platform for in situ measures of chemistry, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Part 2: Integrated application to a shallow estuary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this