A final (?) note on implicit/explicit speech equivalence

Philip H. Marshall; Sarah A. Cartwright

doi:10.3758/BF03334573

A final (?) note on implicit/explicit speech equivalence

Philip H. Marshall, Sarah A. Cartwright

Psychological Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The recitation of lists of words varying in syllabic content or of sentences in grammatical or ungrammatical order failed to demonstrate the previously reported equivalence between implicit and explicit speech. It was suggested that explicit recitation takes longer because of the greater effort involved in producing an audible response.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	409
Number of pages	1
Journal	Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Volume	15
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334573
State	Published - Jun 1980

Access to Document

10.3758/BF03334573

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

Marshall, P. H., & Cartwright, S. A. (1980). A final (?) note on implicit/explicit speech equivalence. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15(6), 409. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334573

@article{4321b460796b40dc999213eb782fac5e,

title = "A final (?) note on implicit/explicit speech equivalence",

abstract = "The recitation of lists of words varying in syllabic content or of sentences in grammatical or ungrammatical order failed to demonstrate the previously reported equivalence between implicit and explicit speech. It was suggested that explicit recitation takes longer because of the greater effort involved in producing an audible response.",

author = "Marshall, {Philip H.} and Cartwright, {Sarah A.}",

year = "1980",

month = jun,

doi = "10.3758/BF03334573",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "409",

journal = "Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society",

issn = "0090-5054",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A final (?) note on implicit/explicit speech equivalence

AU - Marshall, Philip H.

AU - Cartwright, Sarah A.

PY - 1980/6

Y1 - 1980/6

N2 - The recitation of lists of words varying in syllabic content or of sentences in grammatical or ungrammatical order failed to demonstrate the previously reported equivalence between implicit and explicit speech. It was suggested that explicit recitation takes longer because of the greater effort involved in producing an audible response.

AB - The recitation of lists of words varying in syllabic content or of sentences in grammatical or ungrammatical order failed to demonstrate the previously reported equivalence between implicit and explicit speech. It was suggested that explicit recitation takes longer because of the greater effort involved in producing an audible response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925926350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03334573

DO - 10.3758/BF03334573

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925926350

VL - 15

SP - 409

JO - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

JF - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

SN - 0090-5054

IS - 6

ER -