A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth: Reply to Engelhardt

Andrew Young

A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth: Reply to Engelhardt

Free Market Institute

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

I respond to Engelhard's (2009, QJAE) criticism of by (2009) article. I demonstrate that, contrary to Engelhardt's claims, non-depreciating capital is not sufficient for secular growth.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	63-67
Journal	Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
State	Published - Aug 2009

Cite this

@article{af6c123bdb1d4329bcd65fd27a4aed97,

title = "A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth: Reply to Engelhardt",

abstract = "I respond to Engelhard's (2009, QJAE) criticism of by (2009) article. I demonstrate that, contrary to Engelhardt's claims, non-depreciating capital is not sufficient for secular growth.",

author = "Andrew Young",

year = "2009",

month = aug,

language = "English",

pages = "63--67",

journal = "Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth: Reply to Engelhardt

AU - Young, Andrew

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - I respond to Engelhard's (2009, QJAE) criticism of by (2009) article. I demonstrate that, contrary to Engelhardt's claims, non-depreciating capital is not sufficient for secular growth.

AB - I respond to Engelhard's (2009, QJAE) criticism of by (2009) article. I demonstrate that, contrary to Engelhardt's claims, non-depreciating capital is not sufficient for secular growth.

M3 - Article

SP - 63

EP - 67

JO - Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

JF - Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

ER -

A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth: Reply to Engelhardt

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this